2024年 新着論文 40 糖尿病診療分野から論文が発表されました
Predictors of the effectiveness of isCGM usage in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: post-hoc analysis of the ISCHIA study
- PMID: 39101179
- PMCID: PMC11291818 (available on )
- DOI: 10.1007/s13340-023-00683-5
Abstract
Aim: The Effect of Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Glycemic Control Including Hypoglycemia and Quality of Life of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (ISCHIA) study was a randomized, crossover trial that reported the decrease in time below range (TBR) by the use of intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) combined with structured education in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated by multiple daily injections. The participants were instructed to perform frequent scanning of the isCGM sensor (10 times a day or more) and ingest sugar when impending hypoglycemia is suspected by tracking the sensor glucose levels and the trend arrow. We conducted post-hoc analysis to identify factors affecting difference in TBR (∆TBR), in time in range (∆TIR), and in time above range (∆TAR).
Participants and methods: Data from 93 participants who completed the ISCHIA study were used. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify factors affecting CGM metrics.
Results: Pearson’s correlation analysis showed the negative association between log-transformed scan frequency and with ∆TBR (r = – 0.255, P = 0.015), while there was no significant association of log-transformed scan frequency with ∆TIR (r = 0.172, P = 0.102) and ∆TAR (r = 0.032, P = 0.761), respectively. The log-transformed scan frequency was an independent predictor of ∆TBR (Beta = – 7.712, P = 0.022), but not of ∆TIR(Beta = 7.203, P = 0.091) and of ∆TAR (Beta = 0.514, P = 0.925).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that more frequent scanning of isCGM may be beneficial to reduce TBR in T1D adults.
Keywords: Hypoglycemia; Sensor scanning; Type 1 diabetes; isCGM.
© The Japan Diabetes Society 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestNo potential conflicts of interest (COI) as the ISCHIA Study Group relevant to this article were reported. Potential COI concerning all individual investigators were reviewed by the Certified Review Board in accordance with the Clinical Trials Act [9]. The COI of the members of the writing group are as follows: YH received lecture fee from Abbott, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Sumitomo and Terumo and received research grant from Sumitomo. AK received lecture fee from Eli Lilly. MM received lecture fee from Abbott, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi, and received research grant from Novo Nordisk. SM received lecture fee from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. JM received lecture fee from Terumo. AS received lecture fee from Abbott and Terumo. AT received lecture fee from Abbott, Eli Lilly, Sanofi and Terumo. MT received lecture fee from Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sumitomo and received subsidies from Cocokara Fine Healthcare, LifeScan, Roche DC and Super Light Water. TM, KH, K Kato, K Koyama, RK, YM, JM, KN, NS and SS declare that they have no conflict of interest.