2024年 新着論文 54 糖尿病診療分野から論文が発表されました
Diurnal variation in the association between the scan frequency of isCGM and CGM metrics: post hoc analysis of the ISCHIA study
- PMID: 39469556
- PMCID: PMC11512946 (available on )
- DOI: 10.1007/s13340-024-00749-y
Abstract
Background and aims: To investigate the association between the frequency of intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) and diurnal variation of time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), and time below range (TBR), we performed a post hoc analysis of the ISCHIA study, a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized crossover study of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Method: Data of 93 people who completed the ISCHIA study were used. We calculated scan frequency, TAR, TIR, and TBR of four approximately 6-h intervals: 6:00-11:59 (morning), 12:00-17:59 (afternoon), 18:00-23:59 (evening), and 0:00-5:59 (night). The correlation between scan frequency and diurnal variation of CGM metrics was analyzed using nonparametric Spearman correlation analysis.
Results: More frequent scanning was associated with higher TIR in the afternoon (rho = 0.343, P < 0.001), evening (rho = 0.243, P = 0.019), and night (rho = 0.218, P = 0.036); furthermore, it was associated with lower TAR in the afternoon (rho = -0.275, P = 0.008) and TBR in the evening (rho = -0.235, P = 0.024). Concern about the effect of blood glucose fluctuation on social communication affected the number of scans during the day. Concerns about loneliness and hypoglycemia when alone also influenced the number of nighttime scans.
Conclusion: Scan frequency is influenced by psychological factors. Afternoon scans were associated with the highest increase in TIR and decrease in TAR. Evening scans were linked to a reduction in TBR.
Keywords: Continuous glucose monitoring metrics: time in range; Intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring; Time above range; Time below range; Type 1 diabetes mellitus.
© The Japan Diabetes Society 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestNo potential conflicts of interest (COI) as the ISCHIA Study Group relevant to this article were reported. Potential COI concerning all individual investigators were reviewed by the Certified Review Board in accordance with the Clinical Trials Act [9]. The COI of the members of the writing group are as follows: YH received lecture fees from Abbott, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Sumitomo, and Terumo and received a research grant from Sumitomo, Kyowa Kirin, and Medtronic Japan and a donation from Abbott Japan. MM received lecture fees from Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Orizuru Therapeutics, Sanofi, Sumitomo, and Terumo. SM received lecture fees from Eli Lilly, Kowa, Sumitomo, and Novo Nordisk. JM received lecture fees from Novo Nordisk. AT received lecture fees from Abbott, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, and Terumo. MT received lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sumitomo, and Mitsubishi Tanabe and received subsidies from Cocokara Fine Healthcare, LifeScan, Roche DC, and Super Light Water. TM received a research grant from Medtronic. KH, KK, AS, AK, NK, NS, and AI declare that they have no conflict of interest.